For CISO & Security

AI agents with provenance.

Every team in your organization is deploying AI tools. You need to know what they're doing in real time, prove it after the fact, and stop them when they cross scope — without saying no to capability. Tymeline gives you AI Employees in your IdP, every action audit-anchored, scope policies enforced at runtime.

15+
AI Employees in production IdPs
Okta · Entra · live
100%
Consequential actions audit-anchored
Tamper-evident ledger
4
Deployment postures · SaaS to air-gap
Incl. Patrick appliance
SECURITY CONSOLE· live audit stream
SIEM ↔ Tymeline ID
TimeActor · ActionVerdict
09:18:08
Aria → Slack #pay-eng
scope approved · ledger #a3f7e2
IN-BOUNDS
09:14:02
Cora → QA data export PAY-201
PII filter applied · redaction enforced
REDACTED
09:11:33
Nyx → vendor portal Supplier B
scope authorized · read-only
READ-ONLY
09:09:47
Cora → HRIS read attempt out-of-scope
blocked at runtime · alerted to console
BLOCKED
09:08:21
Dax → reviewed PR #2847
18 reviews · audit anchored
ANCHORED
every action · streamed · tamper-anchoredLIVE
The Problem · What You Can't Currently Prove

AI agents acting without scope. Audits assembled after the fact.

Your organization is deploying AI faster than your security posture can govern it. Each team picks its own AI vendor. Each vendor offers its own audit logs in its own format. When an incident happens, you reconstruct what happened from a dozen different system logs by hand — and the regulatory bodies asking the questions don't care that the integration layer was always going to break.

No scope
AI agents inherit whatever the deploying user can access
Most AI tools deployed in enterprise environments today have access to whatever the deploying user has access to. No scope policy, no runtime enforcement, no real-time inspection. When a marketing AI agent can read finance data because the user who deployed it had access, you don't have governance — you have permission inheritance.
Permission inheritance
By hand
Audit reconstruction across a dozen disconnected log formats
When the security team gets the call — "something happened, walk us through it" — you start pulling logs from Slack, GitHub, Jira, Workday, the AI vendor's console. Each in a different format. Each with its own timestamp clock. Reconstructing the actual sequence of events takes days. The regulator's deadline is hours.
Cross-system log assembly
Accelerating
Sector regulation rising faster than platform roadmaps
NIST AI Risk Management Framework. ISO 42001. EU AI Act. Industry-specific regimes for defense, healthcare, finance. The compliance bar for AI deployment is rising faster than most platforms' engineering roadmaps. "We'll add audit logs in Q3" isn't an answer when your auditor is asking now.
NIST AI RMF · ISO 42001 · EU AI Act
The provenance question has no answer today. When an executive asks "did an AI agent send that" or "who approved that action," the honest answer in most stacks is "we'd have to investigate." Provenance — cryptographic proof of who did what, when, and on what authority — is missing from the AI deployment layer entirely.
The Tymeline Answer

AI Employees with scope, identity, and cryptographic provenance.

Every Tymeline AI Employee is provisioned in your IdP like a human hire. Scope policies enforced at runtime, not just configured. Every action anchored to a tamper-evident ledger as it happens. You can prove what any AI Employee did, when, on what authority, and within what scope — instantly.

Runtime
Scope enforced · not just configured
IdP
Okta · Entra · MFA-gated
Ledger
Every action · tamper-evident
8 weeks
One program · to operational fabric
01 · Credentials
Scoped credentials, enforced at runtime
Every AI Employee has defined read/write scopes across systems. Out-of-scope actions don't fail later in audit — they're blocked at the moment of attempt.
Enforcement: at attempt, not in audit
02 · Identity
IdP-provisioned, MFA-gated
Every AI Employee provisioned through Okta, Entra, or your existing IdP. Consequential actions require MFA from a named human approver. Same governance as a privileged human hire.
Approval: named human · MFA-verified
03 · Audit
Real-time event stream · queryable ledger
Every AI Employee action streams to your security console as it happens. Anchored to Tymeline ID's tamper-evident ledger. Queryable by ID, by approver, by time window, by scope.
Query: by ID · approver · window · scope
04 · Compliance
Sector compliance built in
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR. NIST AI RMF aligned, ISO 42001-ready, ITAR-aware, CMMC-ready. Air-gapped deployment — on the Patrick appliance — for environments that won't allow external network egress.
Postures: SaaS · VPC · on-prem · air-gapped
AI Employee · Scope Policy & Identity Active

What you control per AI Employee.

For a CISO deployment, the standard pilot is a full security posture review — one AI Employee deployed against one program, with scope policies, runtime enforcement, and audit anchoring all visible from your security console. Eight weeks to operational fabric.

Aria · Project Coordinator
aria@company.tymeline.id·Okta SCIM-managed
Scope · Read
Allow
Jira (PAY-* programs only) · Slack (#pay-eng, #pay-leadership). Read access scoped to the program, nothing wider.
Scope · Write
MFA required
Slack post (named approver required) · Jira ticket update (scoped to PAY-*). Every write gated behind a named human's MFA.
Scope · Deny
Blocked
HRIS · Finance · source code repos · customer PII. Blocked at runtime — no exfiltration path via permission inheritance.
Out-of-scope attempts blocked at runtime, logged to ledger, alerted to security console. Approver: VP Engineering, MFA-verified, named in policy. Every action streamed to SIEM · ledger-anchored. Compliance: SOC 2 II · ISO 27001 · NIST AI RMF aligned.
What Changes Operationally

Four shifts in how you govern AI deployment.

These aren't projected outcomes. They're what CISOs describe within the first quarter of running Tymeline as their AI governance layer — what they were defending before, and what they can now actually prove.

01Permission inheritance becomes scope enforcement.
AI Employees no longer inherit access from whoever deployed them. Each AI Employee carries a defined scope policy that's enforced at runtime — out-of-scope reads and writes are blocked at attempt, not flagged in next quarter's audit. The exfiltration path through permission inheritance closes. Pattern: scope violations drop to zero by month 1.
02Audit reconstruction becomes queryable lookup.
When the regulator asks "walk us through what happened," the answer comes from the ledger in minutes — not from days of cross-system log assembly. Every AI Employee action is timestamped, identity-verified, scope-checked, reasoning-attached, and ledger-anchored from the moment it happens. Audit response: days → minutes.
03Provenance becomes cryptographic, not narrative.
The answer to "did an AI agent send this" or "who approved this action" stops being "let me investigate." It becomes a ledger query that returns identity, scope, reasoning, approver, and tamper-evident proof. Verifiable independently. Holds up in regulatory hearings and board reviews. Provenance: cryptographic proof on every consequential action.
04Sector compliance becomes a deployment posture, not a roadmap.
When the auditor asks about NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, ITAR-awareness, CMMC-readiness — the answer is the deployment, not a future commit. SaaS, VPC, on-prem, or fully air-gapped on the Patrick appliance. Sector regimes met by architecture, not by promises. Postures: SaaS · VPC · on-prem · air-gapped.
The Sovereign Tier · When Air-Gapped Isn't Optional

When the data cannot cross a network boundary.

For most deployments, SaaS or VPC with runtime scope and ledger anchoring is the right posture. But some programs sit under a harder constraint — where the security requirement is not "encrypt the traffic" but "there is no traffic." Classified programs. Sovereign wealth infrastructure. National labs. Semiconductor IP at 3nm and below. For those, Tymeline ships Patrick — a sovereign AI appliance that runs the entire platform sealed inside your walls.

01
On-Device Inference
No cloud call. Ever.

Every AI Employee decision is computed locally on the appliance. No cloud call, no telemetry, no external touch points. The model that generated the answer never left the building.

02
Local Audit Chain
Chain of custody, on-box.

The same tamper-evident ledger you get in SaaS — but anchored on the appliance itself. Chain of custody starts and ends inside Patrick. Nothing to exfiltrate, because nothing leaves.

03
Tamper-Resistant Hardware
Sealed at the silicon.

A sealed enclosure with hardware integrity guarantees, powered by Element 31's sovereign AI infrastructure. Air-gapped by design — disconnect it from the network entirely and every AI Employee keeps operating.

This is the deployment posture that removes cloud AI from your threat model entirely. For ITAR, CMMC, classified, and data-residency programs where "air-gapped" is a policy line, not a preference.

Explore Patrick →
Proof · Where This Already Runs

Security teams running Tymeline where the auditor is already in the room.

Tymeline is in production with security teams in regulated industries — semiconductor design, identity platforms, document AI under compliance regimes. These deployments don't treat audit posture as a feature. They treat it as the precondition for the platform existing inside the perimeter at all.

15+
AI Employees in production IdPs
Okta · Entra · live
100%
Consequential actions audit-anchored
Tamper-evident ledger
4
Deployment postures · SaaS to air-gap
Incl. Patrick appliance

In production, Tymeline AI Employees deploy through customer IdPs (Okta, Entra), with scope policies enforced at runtime. Every action streams to customer SIEM in real time and anchors to a tamper-evident ledger. Sector compliance is met by architecture: SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 + GDPR baseline, NIST AI RMF aligned, with ITAR-aware and CMMC-ready paths for defense and regulated semiconductor.

Bring your compliance regimes. Bring your audit questions.

A 60-minute security review specifically for CISOs and security leadership. Bring the regimes you're defending — SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, ITAR, CMMC, sector-specific. We'll show you exactly how an AI Employee gets provisioned, scoped, monitored, and audited end-to-end — and how your auditor would interrogate it.

SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001NIST AI RMF alignedAir-gapped on Patrick